There is no question of the elections in Venice, just a few questions

dunki31

Based on the debate on the "sending" to Venice by the Constitutional Court of the issue of elections, I would like to clarify the public opinion and any other self-proclaimed constitutionalist as follows: The case has not gone to Venice and the latter will not express the acceptance or not, etc. of the request and its basis, as this will be done only by the Constitutional Court. He will simply be sent some questions that will help the court in making a decision. Venice does not need a fact-finding mission because it has done it for the opinion of the President's violations and it cuts down a lot of time. It will proceed with an accelerated procedure, the court has left until tomorrow 16:00 for questions, so only 2 days.

The court has, based Cambodia WhatsApp Number Data on Article 44/b of its law, to request an amicus curia opinion or from a friend of the court, as it has done in this case from the People's Advocate. This decision has a logical basis and is fair, because the commission has given an opinion about the alleged violations of the President, but has not given anything about any of our claims and the nature of our case. It is a very fair decision and it shows prudence from this court that is being asked to make a "revolution" in Albania. Venice will give a general opinion on the questions without putting the Court in front of the lack of space for its assessment, as this has never happened and will never happen. The opinion is indicative of the questions and has no binding force.



The court has completed the investigation of the case as far as the parties are concerned and now only the discussion on the answers that will be received remains. So the following process has not stopped. Justice is measured neither by the unit of measure of stupidity, nor of anger, nor of speed, but only by truth and its correct assessment. To protect the court from attacks without a point of logic because it is showing very high integrity and professionalism, despite the fact that the members are new to this court. Let's not "kill" an institution that we couldn't wait to have now that is coming back strongly in defense of the State of Law! Constitutionalism is not a "sport" that anyone can practice, but only true professionals, who are very, very few! Related news "Why do you see me?"/ The young man stabbed two teenagers.